The Penny Ant (Tetramorium bicarinatum) in central Texas

19 Aug 2014   | Uncategorized

This article by Jerry Cates was first published on 18 August 2014, and last revised on 13 October 2014. © Bugsinthenews Vol. 15:08(01)

Summary: In this article the author reports on specimens of small (2.7-3.4 mm in length) stinging ants collected from two locations in Williamson County, Texas, members of the Formicidae subfamily Myrmicinae and identified as the penny ant, Tetramorium bicarinatum (Nylander, 1846). This tramp ant, which is native to the Indo-Pacific, has managed to stow away on sea-going vessels and, most likely, aircraft as well, and is now spread worldwide, though — from all indications — it is nowhere very numerous. It has two isolated segments (petiole and postpetiole) between the alitrunk and gaster, conspicuous moderately-large eyes, a 12-segmented antenna, simple spurs on the middle and hind tibia, conspicuous propodeal spines, a square shaped petiole, a light colored head and alitrunk, and a dark colored gaster. This species is relatively rare in Texas, but is known to be capable of disrupting species diversity wherever it is found. In the two cases where the author encountered colonies of this ant, the residents of homes it was invading were complaining of nodular skin lesions that — based on advice received from physicians who had diagnosed the lesions as being of insect origin — they had presumed to be caused by bed bugs. As J. K. Wetterer explains in a recent paper published in Sociobiology, this ant has often been confused with another ant, Pheidole guineensis (Fabricus), leading some to apply “Guinea ant” as its common name. Coincidentally, Wetterer goes on to explain, an unrelated species from Africa with the valid taxonomical name Tetramorium guineense (Bernard, 1953), compounds the problem and adds to the confusion. To help improve the public’s understanding of this ant’s identity, Wetterer proposes a new common name, the penny ant, based on the coloration of the ant’s copper-brown exoskeleton, which — as the microscope photos posted here show clearly — is similar to that of a newly minted copper penny.

 

08132014 ANT UNDER REFR 75X LAT HAB EDOF 1024

001. Ant found under refrigerator, near a dermestid beetle larval casting, on 13 August 2014.

08162014 ANT AT MAILBOX 75X LAT HAB 1024

002. Ant collected from the mailbox, at the end of the driveway of the same home, on 16 August 2014.

 On Tuesday, 12 August 2014, I received a call from a young mother whose 7-month-old baby boy had been experiencing a recurring series of tiny red skin lesions all over his body.

Since birth this baby has had bouts of rashes, suspected by his pediatrician to be a consequence of normal postnatal development that he should soon outgrow. Recently, though, the lesions have been more robust in appearance, and sometimes presented as hardened nodules with light-colored pustules at their centers. On seeing these, his pediatrician wondered if they might be caused by insect bites, possibly even bed bugs. Hence the mother’s telephone call to my office.

“Would  it be possible,” she asked, “for you to conduct an inspection to determine what might be the cause?” She explained that her schedule was open the next day.

I arrived at her tidy, tree-shaded home — located in a rustic northwest Austin subdivision, on the southern edge of Williamson County — at 10:00 AM the next morning. A forensic sweep was soon conducted in the master bedroom, and the room where the child’s crib was kept. It took only a few minutes to discount the likelihood that bed bugs were involved. No evidence of bed bug infestations was found in the baby’s crib, the baby’s or parents’ bedrooms, or in any of the bedrooms’ furnishings.

As usual, when nothing is found in the bedrooms of a home where bed bug infestations are believed by the occupants to be present, I next conducted a forensic sweep of the flooring under the kitchen stove and refrigerator.

Between 30-40% of the bed bug inspections I perform conclude with finding organisms other than bed bugs that are causing skin lesions in the human occupants of the home. Often the organisms involved are found in parts of the home other than the bedrooms. To most, this is surprising, as the lesions they are experiencing seem most prominent in the morning, after a night’s sleep, leading them to believe the events causing the lesions took place while they slept. Sometimes that is the case, but the lesions that show up after a night’s sleep may also be the outward manifestation of an event or series of events that took place one, two, or as many as three or more days earlier.

The kitchen often hosts as many organisms as any other place in the home, particularly on the flooring under the refrigerator and stove. Such locations provide harborage for insects and other animals, and tend to be stocked with what might best be termed “accidental nutriment.” The latter is deposited over time when pet food and remnants of the cooking arts fall into cracks and crevices and are swept under appliances. After fermenting and hardening, this food matter becomes fodder for the minuscule wildlife that thrives in darkened places, out of sight and mind of the humans who live there. As the insect and arachnid occupants of this cryptic redoubt proceed through their life cycles, they leave behind artifacts that open windows through which forensic investigators may view, and reconstruct, the past.

Soon the casting of a dermestid beetle larva, and — next to it — the carcass of a small ant, were spotted. Both were placed on a neutral gray plate, staged under a digital microscope  (an AM4815ZTL Dino-Lite Edge), and thereupon displayed on the screen of a lap-top computer, visible to all to see.

The dermestid beetle larval casting was found to be of a species that — in its larval life form — bristles with hastisetae, tufts of fine hairs with spear-pointed tips and barbed shafts. Dermestid larval hastisetae are capable of producing skin lesions in sensitive individuals. Their lesions present in the form of rashes and reddened wheals of various sizes, but not as hardened nodules of the kind that had been found on the infant in this home.

Next the microscope stage was manipulated to bring the ant into view. As the magnified image of the ant’s habitus came into focus, I was surprised at the striking resemblance it had to another ant I’d found almost nine months earlier.

That ant, from another subdivision about five miles north of here, in south-central Williamson County, was discovered on 18 November 2013. It was not a Texas native. Workers from at least two mounds, situated in the soil of that home’s yard, were foraging inside the home and stinging the occupants. The stings produced skin lesions that the home’s occupants had thought, as in the case before us, to be bed bug bites. As in this instance, no bed bugs were found, and — unlike the case before us (where dermestid beetle larval hastisetae was found) — the only other candidate that might have caused the bites experienced by the homeowners was this ant. I’d treated the earlier home and yard with a bait and a growth regulator, and have heard nothing more from the owners. In the meantime, my analysis of the specimens I collected of that ant continued, and plans were being made to publish an article on it before long. Now, with evidence that its range was extending, the importance of publishing those findings increased.

The home where this ant had been found last November was ensconced in a relatively new subdivision in south-central Williamson County. My tentative conclusion at the time was that it was a species of fire/harvester ant in the Myrmicinae subfamily (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), and the tribe Myrmicini. Before encountering it in the present case, I had not been successful in identifying it to genus and species. Now, with evidence the ant was more widespread than I’d earlier believed, I redoubled my efforts to arrive at a firm conclusion, first using Bolton’s dichotomous keys to the Formicidae, then using Carleton College’s on-line Identification Guide to the ants of Cowling Arboretum and McKnight Prairie, administered by Tim Linksvayer, which identified the genus as Tetramorium. Armed with this crucial information, a perusal of the literature on the genus produced detailed descriptions of various species, ultimately leading to T. bicarinatum (Nylander, 1846).

11182013 A R STINGING ANT RT LAT HAB EDOF 1024

200. Ant collected in back yard of home in south central Williamson County on 18 November 2013

11182013 A R STINGING ANT DORSAL HEAD EDOF 1024

201. Dorsal head of ant species depicted in fig. 200. Note the deeply incised frontal carina.

11182013 A R STINGING ANT RT LATERODORSAL MIDBODY EDOF 1024

202. Mid-body region of the ant depicted in fig. 200. Note the propodeal spines, and the pointed propodeal lobe.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

—————————————–

Taxonomy:

  • Kingdom Animalia (ahn-uh-MAYHL-yuh)  — first described in 1758 by the Swedish taxonomist Carolus Linnaeus (1707 – 1778), using the Latin word animal = “a living being,” from the Latin word anima = “vital breath”, to refer to multicellular, eukaryotic organisms whose body plans become fixed during development, some of which undergo additional processes of metamorphosis later in their lives; most of which are motile, and thus exhibit spontaneous and independent movements; and all of whom are heterotrophs that feed by ingesting other organisms or their products;
  • Phylum Arthropoda (ahr-THROPP-uh-duh) — first described in 1829 by the French zoologist Pierre André Latreille [November 20, 1762 – February 6, 1833], using the two Greek roots αρθρον (AR-thrawn) = jointed + ποδ (pawd) = foot, in an obvious reference to animals with jointed feet, but in the more narrow context of the invertebrates, which have segmented bodies as well as jointed appendages;
  • Class Insecta (Linnaeus, 1758) — named using the Latin word insectum, a calque of the Greek word ἔντομον ( EN-toh-mawn) = “(that which is) cut into sections”; comprised of arthropods with chitinous external (exo-) skeletons, a three part body composed of a distinct head, thorax, and abdomen, the midmost part having three pairs of jointed legs, and the foremost part having a pair of compound eyes and antennae;
  • Order Hymenoptera (hye-muhn-OPP-turr-uh) — first described in 1758 by the Swedish taxonomist Carl Linnaeus (1707 – 1778), who combined the Greek words ὑμήν (HEW-meen) = “membrane” + πτερόν (TARE-awn) = “wing”, thus ὑμενόπτερος (hew-men-OPP-tehr-ose) = “membrane-winged” to refer to insects with membranous wings, specifically the sawflies, wasps, bees, and ants; this is one of the largest orders of insects, and includes over 130,000 species;
  • Infraorder Aculeata (ah-KEW-lee-AW-tuh) — from the Latin word aculeate = “stinging” — a monophyletic lineage of Hymenoptera in which the ovipositor is modified into a stinger, thus comprising the wasps, ants and bees; not all can sting; in some the ovipositor is modified to enable inserting eggs into crevices, and in others the structure has been entirely lost; the group embraces the eusocial Hymenopterans; the possession of a venomous sting provides an extraordinary defense against predators and is thought to be a major prerequisite for the evolution of social behavior; the infraorder is typically divided into three superfamilies: 1. Apoidea, comprising the sphecoid wasps and bees, 2. Chrysidoidea, comprising the parasitoid or kleptoparasitic wasps, and 3. Vespoidea, comprising the wasps and ants;
  • Superfamily Vespoidea (vess-POY-dee-uh) — from the Latin word vespa = “wasp” — presently divided into ten families;
  • Family Formicidae (fohr-MISS-uh-dee) — first described in 1809 by the French zoologist Pierre André Latreille (1762 – 1833), from the Latin formica = “ant” to refer to hymenopteran insects that have elbowed antennae and a narrow waist that separates the thorax from the abdomen with a node-like petiole. Bolton (1994) prescribes the following characters for assigning a hymenopteran insect to the eusocial vespoid Formicidae family: 1. perennial colonies with a wingless worker caste; 2. female castes (workers and queens) with prognathous (mandibles projecting beyond the coronal plane) heads, 3. antennas with 4-12 segments in female castes, 9-13 in male castes; 4. antennas also geniculate (knee or L-shaped), having a long basal segment or scape followed by a series of shorter funicular segments; 5. a reduced second abdominal segment which forms a node or scale — the petiole — which is isolated from the alitrunk anteriorly, and the remaining abdominal segments posteriorly, wherein frequently the third abdominal segment is also reduced and isolated to form a second node, the postpetiole; 6. the wings of alate queens are deciduous and are shed after mating; and 7. wherein a metapleural gland is generally present on the alitrunk, having an opening above the metacoxa. At present, 20 distinct subfamilies of ants are recognized. KEY TO SUBFAMILY: Those formicines with two reduced or isolated segments (petiole and postpetiole) between the alitrunk and gaster — as in the case of the ant described in this article — are assigned to either the Myrmicinae or Ecitoninae subfamilies (see Linksvayer, Couplet 4); the subfamily Ecitoninae is comprised of ants that are either eyeless or whose eyes are reduced to blisters, unlike ants with conspicuous eyes as with those described in this article, thus commending their assignment to the subfamily Myrmicinae;
  • Subfamily Myrmicinae: approximately 140 genera in 25 tribes, all cosmopolitan; the pupae lack cocoons; some species retain a functional sting; the petioles have two nodes; nests are permanent, in soil, rotting wood, under stones or in trees; the subfamily includes leaf cutters (tribe Attini), acrobat (tribe Crematogasterini), harvester (tribe Myrmicini), big-headed (tribe Pheidolini), and fire (tribes Blepharidattini, Myrmicini, and Solenopsidini) ants; KEY TO TRIBE: the ants described and depicted in this article appear to be myrmicines with 1. 12 antennal segments… microscopic analysis continues, and images of the characters that eventually led to the diagnosis of this ant as a member of the tribe Tetramoriini, the genus Tetramorium, and the species T. bicarinatum, are now being prepared for posting here. Please stand by.

—————————-

References:

—————————-

— Questions? Comments? Corrections? e-mail [email protected]. You may also register, log in, and leave a detailed comment in the space provided below.