A Broad-banded Water Snake near Houston, Texas

This article by Jerry Cates and Gaynor was first published on 17 May 2012 and revised last on 8 July 2012. © Bugsinthenews Vol. 13:05(06).


Broad-banded water snake (Nerodia fasciata confluens), body, in shadows; Gaynor, Sugarland, TX --- 17 May 2012

Broad-banded water snake, in the shadows

On 17 May 2012 Gaynor wrote the following:

“Help, please:

Is this snake poisonous or not?

I found one about a year ago about twice this size on my front porch, and now found this one in my back yard. I have small dogs, so I would like to identify the kind of snake it is.

We live in a suburban neighborhood, but our lot backs up to a bayou and wooded area with a golf course.

I would sure appreciate knowing if this snake is poisonous or not!

Thanks, Gaynor”

The harmless broad-banded water snake is a beautiful snake, with broad bands of olive, black, dark brown, and reddish brown patches separated by yellowish interstices. Those colors practically scream “copperhead” to the uninitiated, and even give many, if not most experienced herpers a start for a second or two when they happen upon one in the wild. It seems likely that this similarity is another example of Batesian mimicry (Wickler, 1968) that benefits the water snake by causing it to be mistaken for a copperhead, and thus to be given a wider berth — sparing its life — than would otherwise be the case.

Humans are not the snake’s natural predators, and its mimicry of a copperhead does not bode well for its survival in the presence of a human wielding a hoe. Studies show, however, that humanity affects the survivorship of natricine snakes such as this one way beyond our fondness for swinging hoes at the snakes we find in the wild. One analysis (Hopkins, 2005) of the effects of cholinesterase-inhibiting pesticides, washed into waterways after being applied to yards, showed that snakes exposed to such pesticides experience significant reductions in swimming velocity for up to 96 hours afterward. Though many cholinesterase inhibitors have been removed from the market in the past decade, some — notably among them the carbaryl Sevin, a mainstay in the arsenal of backyard gardeners — continue to be marketed.

Even people who desire to spare the lives of non-venomous serpents have difficulty discriminating between this species and the copperhead, though, mostly because these snakes exhibit a considerable amount of variation from one specimen to another, not only in terms of coloration, but also in the placement and consistency of the bands of color involved. Gaynor’s specimen has unusually consistent banding, but the photo was taken with the snake under a chair, camouflaged by the dark shadows cast by the chair’s seat straps.

Processing the photograph with Adobe Photoshop softened the dark shadows and brought out the details in the snake’s markings, as shown in the retouched photograph below:

Broad-banded water snake (Nerodia fasciata confluens), body, enhanced; Gaynor, Sugarland, TX --- 17 May 2012

After processing with Adobe Photoshop

I was pretty sure, just by looking at the original photograph Gaynor sent in, that this was a broad-banded water snake, but after manipulating the image with Photoshop all doubts ceased. The most conspicuous evidence for this being a harmless nerodian water snake was the brightly colored, darkly margined lip scales on the snake’s face. Almost all nerodians exhibit this character. The labial scales are larger than the adjoining facial scales, are basically bright yellow in color, and each labial scale is darkly outlined. Unfortunately the quality of this photograph is not sufficient to enable it to be cropped and enlarged to show just the face, but if you click on the photo it will expand to its largest practical size, and you will note it still shows the lip scales plainly, each one separated from the others by a dark thin line (two of which extend all the way to the eye).

Compare this snake with photos of the broad-banded copperhead found in Round Rock in 2009 and you will see what I mean.



  • Kingdom Animalia (ahn-uh-MAYHL-yuh) — first described in 1758 by the Swedish taxonomist Carolus Linnaeus [23 May 1707 – 10 January 1778], using the Latin word animal = “a living being,” from the Latin word anima = “vital breath”, to refer to multicellular, eukaryotic organisms whose body plans become fixed during development, some of which undergo additional processes of metamorphosis later in their lives; most of which are motile, and thus exhibit spontaneous and independent movements; and all of whom are heterotrophs that feed by ingesting other organisms or their products;
  • Phylum Chordata (kohr-DAY-tuh) animals that have, at some point in their life cycle, a hollow dorsal nerve cord, pharyngeal slits, an endostyle, and a post-anal tail.
  • SubphylumVertebrata (vurr-tuh-BRAY-tuh) — chordate animals with backbones and spinal columns;
  • Class Reptilia (repp-TILL-ee-uh) — first described in 1768 by the Austrian naturalist of Italian origin Josephus Nicolaus Laurenti (1735 – 1805), using the Latin verb reptilis = to creep or crawl, in reference to recumbent vertebrate animals that breathe air, lay shelled eggs (or, less often, give live birth), and have skins that are covered in scales and/or scutes;
  • Order Squamata — reptiles whose skins bear horny scales or shields, and who possess movable quadrate bones that enable them to move their upper jaw separately from the bones of their braincase;
  • Suborder Serpentes — elongated, legless, carnivorous reptiles without eyelids and external ears;
  • Family Colubridae — the largest family of snakes worldwide, with 304 genera and 1,938 species. This is not a natural grouping, but a catch-all for serpents that are not easily assigned to other families. The familial name was crafted by the German naturalist Nicolaus Michael Oppel in 1811, in his book Die Ordnungen, Familien und Gattungen der Reptilien als Prodrom einer Naturgeschichte derselben, or The Orders, Families, and Types of Reptiles, from the Latin noun colluber, a general reference to snakes, signifying that the family was to embrace, primarily, the more common, run-of-the-mill (and usually non-venomous) species of serpents known;
  • Subfamily Natricinae (nay-truh-SEE-nee) — from the Latin word, natrix = a water snake; 28 genera of colubrid snakes, including most water snakes but also many others which are essentially terrestrial; all natricines share certain characters;
  • Genus Nerodia (nay-RHO-dee-uh) — first described in 1853, jointly, by the American naturalist Spencer Fullerton Baird (1823–1887), and the French biologist Charles Frédéric Girard (1822–1895), who together crafted the generic name out of the Greek roots ναρος (NAY-rose) = flowing liquid + δια (DEE-uh) = through, as a reference to serpents that swim and search for prey in bodies of water.
  • Species Nerodia fasciata
  • Subspecies Nerodia fasciata confluens

Anatomy: in process

Behavior: in process

Common Names: in process

Distinguishing Characteristics: in process

Distribution: in process

Physiology: in process

Mythology: in process

Similar Families: in process



Questions? Corrections? Comments? e-mail jerry.cates@bugsinthenews.info. You may also register, log in, and leave a detailed comment in the space provided below.